Looked at some claims about Aquinas by Norm Geisler, including a quick look at John 13:19, and then started to respond to the second in the series from Baptist Dogmatics regarding Matthew 24:36. What is “theological” or “dogmatic” exegesis? Well, we will find out more as we continue our review and response. But not tomorrow, though we plan on doing a program at 4:30pm EDT live from ReformCon 2022! Join us then!
Aquinas as a Commentator, Doing “Theological Exegesis” on Matthew 24:36
James White, , Church Fathers, Church History, Debate, Exegesis, General Apologetics, Roman Catholicism, The Dividing Line, Thomism
You Might also like
-
The Changing World of Mormonism
Went in the big studio today to talk about Mormonism and the challenges we face today in seeking to witness of the truth to members of the LDS Church. Did a good bit of reminiscing along the path, since the first books I read and studied from the LDS Church were purchased 41 years ago now. Had them in studio as well!
[embedded content] -
Road Trip Dividing Line: Gay Mirage, Mass, Biblicism
Long day on the road today but I really wanted to get a program in as I may be speaking the next two nights (my trip plans have been changed due to weather). In any case, looked at bit at the two homosexuals and their designer baby story, took the time to clarify some false claims floating around regarding Thomas and the Mass in my understanding, and finished up looking at Christian Smith and his attack upon sola scriptura.
[embedded content] -
Pope Francis, “Growth” and “Consolidation,” and Trent Horn
Though I’m sure certain hyper-Calvinists on the web will have a fit, I responded to Justin Brierley’s article attempting to refute Reformed theology in the context of disputing with a brother, not an enemy. I hope Justin will hear my words in that context. You can find Justin’s article here. I did not finish my review, unfortunately, and will do