John 3:13, Turretin, Pop Thomists
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c4ddd/c4ddd0b4f55836860578d116ac57bfd81109fffc" alt=""
Did about 90 minutes today on a variety of topics but with a bit of a connected theme, digging into the text of John 3:13 as well as looking at Turretin’s discussion of the two natures of Christ. Finished up looking at the amazing behavior of folks on line in response to a new theological journal.
You Might also like
-
Road Trip Schedule – December 7, 2022 – The Reliability of Scripture – Believers’ Baptist Church, 1133 Texas Avenue U, Emory, Texas
var target = document.getElementById(“subsplash-embed-cscc92z”); var script = document.createElement(“script”); script.type = “text/javascript”; script.onload = function() { subsplashEmbed( “+ngyb/lb/ca/+cscc92z?embed”, “https://subsplash.com/”, “subsplash-embed-cscc92z”…
-
The Dividing Line will be LIVE at 5:00pm EDT Zoom Calls
Yeah, well, there you go! And another program tomorrow! Stuff started piling up, so, we went long. Started off with Cambridge, MA legalizing polyamory, discussed what is motivating this degradation of the entire culture, discussed Rome’s refusal to bless same-sex marriages, and looked at bit at the centrality of a Christian worldview. Then transitioned into Michael Lofton’s opening statement in
-
What are We Conserving? What are we Debating?
James White, May 30, 2023May 30, 2023, Christian Worldview, Church Fathers, Church History, Debate, Homosexuality, Personal, Post-Evangelicalism, Roman Catholicism, The Dividing Line, Transinsanity Started off with some thoughts on Ted Cruz’s tweet about Uganda and Charlie Kirk’s comments about conservatism. What are we supposed to be conserving if such basic, foundational truths as family and marriage are negotiable? Then we looked at an article Catholic Answers published last year in response to the “White Question” and then finished up talking about debates (as a long thread had developed in Twitter on the topic).
[embedded content]